millitool
peer-review/

peer-review

Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.

peerreview
Content Preview
---
name: peer-review
description: Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.
allowed-tools: Read Write Edi
How to Use

Recommended: Install to project (local)

mkdir -p .claude/skills
curl -o .claude/skills/peer-review.md \
  https://raw.githubusercontent.com/K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-skills/main/scientific-skills/peer-review/SKILL.md

Skill is scoped to this project only. Add .claude/skills/ to your .gitignoreif you don't want to commit it.

Alternative: Clone full repo

git clone https://github.com/K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-skills

Then reference at scientific-skills/peer-review/SKILL.md

Related Skills

multi-agent-brainstorming
Simulate a structured peer-review process using multiple specialized agents to validate designs, surface hidden assumptions, and identify failure modes before implementation.
workflowmultiagentbrainstorming

by sickn33 (Antigravity) · antigravity-awesome-skills

summary-templates
Use for peer-reviewed journal articles, conference papers, and research studies.
product-teamsummarytemplates

by alirezarezvani · alirezarezvani-claude-skills

scientific-critical-thinking
Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review writing use peer-review.
scientific-critical-thinkingscientificcriticalthinking

by K-Dense-AI · claude-scientific-skills